Out and About: A Panel Discussion with Bolaño Translators Chris Andrews and Natasha Wimmer

Posted by Michael Barron, on November 15, 2012


From left to right: Susan Bernofsky, Natasha Wimmer, and Chris Andrews

*   *   *

Last night in a meeting that was hosted by Susan Bernofsky, and convened at Columbia University's Dodge Hall, Roberto Bolaño's two celebrated translators Chris Andrews and Natasha Wimmer met for the first time. Their panel discussion on the process of translating the famed Chilean writer's work was exceptionally interesting. 

The evening began with Andrews reading a paper on key elements of Bolaño's "fiction-making system." "What is this system?" Andrews said: "How does it work? Bolaño’s fiction invites us to read it genetically, looking for traces of method in the finished work," Andrews said. "[There are] three procedures that can be discerned by genetic reading: expansion, meta-representation, and the circulation of characters." These methods are not new literary devices, but are utilized brilliantly by Bolaño. For example, Andrews compared Bolaño reccuring characters to a technique used by Balzac and even James Fenimore Cooper. Regarding Bolano's use of story expansion, Andrews noted that "Bolaño himself explains in a preface to Distant Star that he blew up the final chapter of Nazi Literature in the Americas because he 'would have preferred a longer story that, rather than mirroring or exploding others, was, in itself, a mirror and an explosion.'" Andrews concluded his portion of the evening by talking about Bolano's naturalness, or his "impression of ease" (a phrase he borrows from Nora Catelli). "Bolaño seemed to have been a compulsive storyteller," said Andrews, "and where other Spanish writers seem to struggle with placing a philosphy or idea within plot, Bolaño was able to do this without much seeming effort."

The discussion was then handed to Wimmer, who gave a fascinating talk about her translation process. She begins, she says, with a literal translation and then works from that to obtain a true translation. She brought up many conundrums a translator faces, such as the struggle to give lift to even the most banal sentences; when to break run-on sentences; how to find voices within Bolaño's work; and how to translate slang. "Spanish," Wimmer said, "maintains steady rhythm in its syntax, whereas English comes off as free-jazz." She mentioned that the most difficult part of 2666 to translate was in "The Part about Fate," Seaman's long, folksy monologue about the Black Panthers and cookbook recipes. 

The discussion was followed by a Q&A in which an audience of MFA students asked the two esteemed translators about translating Spanish into different kinds of English (American vs. British, for example); the number of drafts a translator goes through in making a manuscript; the editing process for translations; and how the two translators view each other's work. For an interesting comparison of their work, we recommend reading the slightly different versions of "Jim," a story that was published in Andrews's translation  in The Insufferable Gaucho, and as an essay in Wimmer's translation in Between Parentheses.

Related Author: Roberto Bolaño |Natasha Wimmer |Chris Andrews |Susan Bernofsky
Related Book: The Insufferable Gaucho |Distant Star |Nazi Literature in the Americas
blog comments powered by Disqus